Well, as part of the film classes in high school René Descartes, born the "peculiar" idea to record a video and well this is the result
A greeting to my students and most of them work in his new blog http://cinerenedescartes.blogspot.com for you to take a miradilla.
leave with you a Student Film Workshop Liceo René Descartes, the music of The yoke with the theme "Maldito Trago" and collaboration of your server, enjoy .-
2. ELECTRIC CARS
electric motors for cars are not new. In as far back as the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, more than 100 years ago, a car designer and constructor of the caliber of Ferdinand Porsche, a car manufactured electric machine was viable. But in those days cars did not run over 40 km / h, travel is less than 100 km and the weight of the vehicle does not mean anything.
Automotive Development advised the use of internal combustion engines, which quickly reached unimaginable heights. Year after year they improved their power (hp), speed (rpm) and speed (miles per hour, including acceleration) were and still are the highest achieved in any car of the twentieth century.
However, environmental pollution, global warming (as a consequence of the above), next to petroleum fuels, advised today in the XXI century, changes in fuel combustion engines internal or something better: its final disposal. This has taken surprise to the auto industry.
A variant propagated by proponents of internal combustion engines, they are not willing to accept the end of its usefulness, could be the switch from fossil fuel (petroleum) and other alcohol-based fuels derived from sugar cane, corn, soybeans, beets and other crops that now serve food to much of the population.
However, the electric motor remains a viable alternative if it develops. Electric cars are today an automotive curiosity. They have very little autonomy, their power sources overweight and its speed does not cover current requirements. However, the inventors meet, compete and develop, but still very slowly.
News arrives that an electric motorcycle recently achieved the world record for acceleration. The autonomy and speed of electric cars are markedly increased in addition, each day the battery (energy source) is lighter.
The electric car does not pollute, does not make noise and renewable energy is only charging the batteries, which can be up to the sunlight. Is it not worth developing such a vehicle? José Carlos de
Santiago
Source: http://www.excellencesmagazines.com/Motor/Issue (1001). Html
3. Chrysler electric vehicles surprise and skepticism cause
used vehicles Chrysler LLC unidentified test, a secret budget and research and development group with a free to innovate in order to produce the shock of last month, the disclosure of three electric vehicles. This step was launched to compete with General Motors Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp. for the right to boast the most efficient vehicles for the use of combustible.Con the order of the then Chief Executive Officer Tom LaSorda to produce working prototypes by this summer (northern hemisphere), in January 2007 selected Chrysler designers and engineers across the company to work in an isolated area of \u200b\u200bits headquarters in Auburn Hills, Michigan, said Doug Quigley, chief engineer of the project. "We were quite surprised here" when Chrysler announced the vehicles on Sept. 23, said Tracy Handler, an analyst with automotive products at Global Insight Inc. in Troy, Michigan. "And probably a little skeptical about how real these are" agregó.Hasta the time of the announcement, Chrysler rarely figured in rumors sector on electric cars, dominated by GM's Chevrolet Volt, due out in 2010, and version of plug electric and gasoline Prius from Toyota. The current Prius contributed to the Japanese market will catch 77% of U.S. electric vehicle fleet initial híbridos.La Chrysler Jeep is a Wrangler, Town & Country minivan and a two-seater sports car called the Dodge EV for now, based design model of Group Lotus Europa Plc.En the event, journalists could do a test drive of an SUV and a car Wrangler two yellow squares on a test track behind company headquarters. An electric minivan was on display. One of the three models will be released in 2010, said Chrysler.Crear prototypes is one thing. A car manufacturer deficit, a quarter the size of GM and Toyota can assemble competitive advanced electric vehicles at a time when falling sales reduces your income, is something different. "It's going to be difficult to pull this off "said Mike Omotoso, Michigan-based analyst for market research firm JD Power & Associates. It is unlikely that Chrysler will have the resources or technology to develop production vehicles for the 2010 target, agregó.Además the Volt, which GM said travel 40 miles (64 kilometers) with an initial charge, Nissan Motor Co., Tokyo, plans to sell all-electric car with a range of 100 miles (160 kilometers), also in 2010. Toyota has no target date for the Prius enchufe.Chrysler used existing models to speed up the process. The disadvantage is that vehicles may lack the weight reduction and aerodynamics of the Volt GM will have its brand new design, Quigley said. Such improvements will be in next-generation models of Chrysler, who are already developing agregó.Será "interesting" to see how Chrysler cover the power requirements of a vehicle the size of a minivan, said David Darovitz, a GM spokesman in Detroit. "They have to submit something," said John Janson, Toyota spokesman in Torrance, California, referring to the Chrysler project. He added that the new zero-emission rules for vehicles, imposed by the Air Resources Board of California, require major automakers to sell some kind of trace emissions vehicle as an electric car, from 2010.Para counter the skepticism with which they were received electric vehicles, Chrysler decided to put 100 prototypes in test fleets. Otherwise, "people automatically conclude that only are words, "said Quigley.Chrysler vehicles will give governments, utilities and other companies from 2009 to try, in terms of world real.Chrysler program called ENVI, a word that is pronounced like" envy "(envy in English), the company chose it as shorthand for "environment", which in English means friendly. 
year 4 students through Presbyterian College David Trumbull. We have entered a blogging competition the Technical University Federico Santa Maria , which has been assigned the topic of Riles and its influence on the environment. In this blog you will find information about electric cars. 
In the early XX, electric cars were more common than internal combustion models for multiple benefits ranging from silent to the fact that work this type of vehicle does not produce noxious fumes of high character. it happened that this type of vehicle began to decline in sales, this is because electric cars have a limited scope. At the beginning of the century, this was not a problem because the only routes were suitable for driving in cities. However, after the First World War, nations began to build highways and roads linking their cities. Which hindered the work of the electric vehicle.
The discovery of abundant oil resources from its depreciation allowed, making gasoline more affordable again to society. But electric cars have not disappeared and the oil crisis back to get known in the automotive world of business, but were best known by the need for countries to adopt sustainable transport measures, to overcome the high environmental pollution affects the world. .
theory prototype electric car, is directed to solve the biggest problem of environmental pollution. You do not need a combustion engine to recharge the battery and internal combustion electric car. Since this electric car can self-generate their own electricity, exploiting the fact that the shape of turning a wheel on a car is similar to the constant rotation of a wind mill resulting in the production of clean electricity.
This car uses the same principle used in hydroelectric plants, which convert the speed and weight of the water into electricity. These examples show that it is possible to convert the displacement speed and weight of a car into electrical energy.
Operation
The electric car is battery operated previously recharged by an external source (such as the outlet), which sends the electricity that the engine needs to drive the car. The car's acceleration will make by spinning the wheel generators, they produce electricity, which is stored in the battery, which in turn sent back to the engine that moves the car.
Unlike the electric car internal combustion car is a type of machine that obtains mechanical energy directly from chemical energy produced by burning fuel in a combustion chamber, the main part of a motor.
Among the many advantages of an electric car a combustion front is the first that does not pollute the environment further. Resulting in a healthy alternative to global warming. Second is the economic manufacture. A burning car has about 7000 different pieces. 40% of business from automakers aftermarket parts and repairs that are virtually electric vehicles. This electric car obviously requires no combustion engine, gearbox, crown, etc cardan. If they are essential in a combustion engine car. This means that will reduce costs of production or manufacture. Resulting in price accessible to all audiences. To this we must add a minimum maintenance and economical as it does not need fuel, the savings grows much more and for the owner, but above all the environment. Costs
The constant hikes in fuel prices has made us see ourselves in the need to find a solution to the large investment we make to our daily mobilization.
On 19 August this year, arrived in Chile-called first 100% electric car, a small Indian-made motor model, called REVA. Having a vehicle be charged by simply plugging and not contaminate the dream of many, but what the numbers back him?
This car measures 1.5 meters high, 1.3 wide and 2.6 long. It was designed for congested city streets, has a top speed of 80 km / h, accelerating from 0 to 40 km / h in about 8 seconds. To charge your battery at 100% must be connected for 8 hours at 220 volts, which allows 80 km of autonomy.
The connection to the power supply costs about $ 130 per hour. That is, a little over $ 1,000 to go 80 kilometers. Not bad, considering spend a conventional car in the same mileage, about $ 2,400 pesos.
Another advantage is the environmental impact it produces. It is true that a zero-emission car helps the environment. However, little use if its use does not become massive, which is the REVA very unlikely, due to its high cost. And in a country like Chile, where the electrical system is not based on so-called "clean energy", each charge of EVAR to the grid, means that "the other side of the plug" is a plant, coal or diesel polluting. The use and promotion of electric cars in our country must be necessarily accompanied by the use of clean and renewable energy.
The Chinese market presents us with another alternative, the "C-ro", belonging to the US-1 brand in China. This model requires 8 to 10 hours of charging, the difference is that spending is $ 700, which allow us to drive 130 kilometers, reducing the cost by 80%. Reaches a maximum speed of 60 km / hr and its selling price is 4 million plus VAT.
By way of comparison, the performance of a combustion engine vehicle is below 40%. So in 10 liters of gasoline launched 6 liters in the form of gases, heat, noise, vibration, waste, etc. More than 400 million tons of carbon dioxide is sent into the atmosphere each year by vehicles worldwide. Oil consumption in the world representing more than 87% of global warming. 90% is generated by cars, ie over 78% of global warming due to the use of oil in internal combustion vehicles. The world is made up about 160,000 cars. Circulating more than 3.000 million vehicles that emit greenhouse gases. In contrast, the level of pollution generated by electric cars is not even half of the pollution generated by burning vehicle internal, making it very favorable electric car use, both for the environment and for personal gain.
Although the benefits of electric cars are higher, as the environment and vehicle costs, compared to internal combustion car, its use has been massive and there are multiple reasons for this question, which mostly relate to the security gained from an electric vehicle and the convenience of capitalists to maintain high profits from sales of cars that use internal combustion of fossil fuels a more lacking in the world, increasing its price and and gains the automotive-related trade.
Studies show the great benefits that produce electric cars, both for ourselves and for the environment. But the question of the majority is, Why not in the market yet?
The main advantage is that electric cars are charged by electricity, but this brings condigo a small storage capacity of batteries in the car and long recharge time, which still causes pollution, since electricity is produced by burning oil and coal, bring essential spending by industry and government. For it is said that one of the many opportunities that this market still is in the amount of money needed Parea develop this unique way to recharge electric cars.
Another difficulty that prevents these electric cars were installed in the market is definitely where the difficulty of charging its batteries, should be designated places where you can charge the battery, bringing more spending for the government because it would only be an installation, distance but each would have to build a loading station for the car, plus the batteries must be renewed every 600 loads (two years approximately) at a cost of $ 700,000.
Another major difficulty is that the flammability of hydrogen, what batteries are constructed to operationalize the car, would be a great danger to everyone. A hydrogen leak could trigger an explosion highly potent. In several countries, these cars are unsafe because they were tested to qualify their safety, in one of these was a car collided 64km / h against a deformable barrier simulating the collision with another car. The result was disastrous because the car was totally destroyed and the driver dummy that had ended up torn between the metal of the vehicle. After this test electric cars are not easily implemented in different markets.
Finally, there is another reason that causes the electric cars are not sold to the masses. Currently
barrel of crude oil is around $ 130 (about 81,510 Chilean pesos) and about a liter of petrol costs 750 Chilean pesos, unlike the general use of electric vehicles equivalent to approximately 1000 pesos Chileans, for distances of up to 80 km with a speed of 80 km / h. Although the provision of internal combustion car is more immediate than the electric car, your costs are much lower, which could jeopardize the investment of hundreds of businessmen who prefer contained automotive electric vehicle sales (which generate less pollution and short term are more economically desirable) to increase profits.
We may add, finally, we believe that these obstacles can be overcome in a not too distant future. Technology advances and new ways to solve these problems soon arise. We'll see how in a few years the mass of electric cars will be real.
If you have enough money Would you invest today (with current technology) your money on a car like this?, explain why.
Consider the famous car REVA, who arrived in Chile with great fanfare, and emerges as the main tender to completely eliminate the pain caused by instability pocket of oil.
(page official promotion in Spain: http://www.elcocheecoelectrico.com/ )
But we would buy a car like this? We face a difficult decision.
analyze benefits and detriments to buy a model like REVA to make a decision. So go with the concrete.
Based on those of the press [1] this car would cost about 6.7 million pesos. Quite high considering it is a small car in few seats inside. It is a city car designed for city use only, with a very limited range (about 80 miles on a charge of 8 hours) and a maximum speed of not more than 80 miles per hour. But instead, according to various sources, the first argument to buy electric cars is economic.
could say that the average Chilean spends about $ 80,000 monthly maintenance of your car, including spare parts, fuel and insurance. [2] With a car like REVA significantly reducing costs:
First, the maintenance costs are almost nil, and the engine does not require special maintenance. Also, the companies importing the parts are cheap, the car tends to fail a lot less than a conventional one and uses less brake and tire.
Second, expenditure on fuel is removed entirely, replacing it with a suitable yield of 80 miles for about $ 1300, which gives us, making a parallel with a conventional car, a consumption of about 47 kilometers per liter (considering the price of gasoline $ 750), an amazing value and unthinkable a few years ago.
loading facility also makes a car like this is convenient. It connects the car by any standard outlet, no adapters of any kind. To charge 100% of the batteries are required eight hours and for 80% capacity just two hours.
is the perfect car for novice drivers, since it has no gearbox. It also foresees that exemption from the registration certificate for 4 years for those who purchase this type of car.
Finally do not forget the environmental need. The existence a car with virtually no emissions in a world that needs it most every day is not a minor issue.
Given the speed with which the runs progress, we are sure that in some years there will be new technologies that go far beyond what we choose today, but immediate action is required. It's a hard desicion, I even risky, but investing in an electric car is very productive.
We decided. If we had the money now in our hands, we would buy an insurance.
[1] National Television of Chile In: http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=xg83sg0qeW8
[2] According to a forum of "United Automobile Chile" so users spend between $ 150,000 and $ 50,000. In: http://www.auch.cl/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=81417
electric cars
Today fuel prices are shot through the roof, which is why we have seen in the impulse to seek new sources of urgent energy. That is why in the world hybrid car sales doubling every year.
is in this context that the electric car looms as a serious alternative to rising fuel costs. At the beginning this type of cars began as small cars that did not reach high speeds and not traveled long distances. Today emerge as the best alterntiva face of rising fuel , which are in condisiciones to compete on par with internal combustion cars.
Documentary - Modern Technology in Automotive
The arrival of electric cars to Chile
As always there is that not even imagine that is the world's first electric car, maybe if the first one sold in Latin America, but electric cars have a long history of discrimination, are often not taken seriously by very good your way, and you have to admit that the desire to decontaminate not sufficient for a definite shift to electric cars, these days, beyond that, which seems to prevail is to save money fuel. Now, with this "stakeholder" petrolio alternative to, as one might come to believe that the thing is going to be serious, thanking unfortunately more to the economy that ecological spirit. 
Many prototypes of electric cars are around the world, all wonderful, but strangely more "defects" are those who come to the market, often fail in their attempt massively to the spice. The prototypes are kept hoping I do not know (actually not so hard to say) while the cars always clean and increasingly expensive now continue to fill the display cases are like fireworks as was the news last month in Chile, today almost no one speaks, let alone heard some help to engage the market or to buy or to invest, perhaps a good way to take this seriously than shares as the different countries such as Portugal and Israel with Nissan, Latin America has nothing to lose nor any power to defend so it is something like only fault of the incompetence of you know who. Where if there is interest and Industries, and many secrets mafia is in the U.S., it says "Who Killed the Electric Car" documentary that counts as the early 90's, the development of electric vehicles in the U.S. was surprising, especially in California. However, this promising alternative route to the oil stopped abruptly. In 1996 General Motors produced the EV1, the first electric car with high prestaciones.6 years later GM decides to make it disappear from the market despite the high demand. Why will it end? 
http://www.fotolog.com/elhinchauy 
http://www.fotolog.com/elhinchauy 
Eduardo de la Barra is the author of several characters seen in daily newspapers as "the Fourth" in which live the erotic "Palomita" The Zagaces "The Piola and the Crab" and other creations may not be as famous as Section Did You Know? or participation in the irreverent "Revista Topaze." Eduardo de la Barra has a Flickr where he regularly exhibits his drawings and his followers or casual readers can learn more about their work, their history and their projects as well if you have a Flickr account, after searching by name, you can contact it, or leave your impressions on your website and you'll not only with their familiar characters, but you can also meet other personal and artistic aspects of the author.
In the images, examples of his works, you know, Popcorn, the string and the Crab, Topaze, and its first 30-page comic written by myself over there in 1971 "strongly."
firm 
. 
With a limited number of people repeatedly in these times, the doors of BJ bar welcomed us again with the largest calideces, to offer an unusual proposal: three-three!
Sincerelypylons had not spent a night like this. The excuses are very clear:
Salsipuedes opened the cold night about two o'clock in the morning with a strong rock fender such a hit you in the chest and reaffirming that the band only sounds good after layers and layers in the studio. In addition to an excellent album that goes in the round, Nicolas (vocals), William (bass), Mauricio (Guitar), Diego (guitar) and Alvaro (drums), we demonstrated that in vivo are as good as canned. With nods to grindcore, several passages of hard rock, many shades of good violas, these people puts us to move to the first issue without falling into the much abused these days Ramonero style. It is worth noting that this band, like the other two that sounded tonight, with little movement in the media and deserve to be disseminated. If you are interested repeated on July 18 in the cabin with Psychotropic Drugs, 7 am and evening.
..
gray day one of these new bands (not so much because the threshing come since 2005 ...) that say a lot with their music. Loading with the simplicity of being very young, the eye is another band of kids more cornered with Green Day ... but they are not. From the guitar follow one another crushing riffs that set the standard of how well these Gurises sound. I remember seeing them in the studios of El Puente FM from the console and to think that such humility and so cool was not seen as often in bands of style. Today I reaffirmed that we can be on stage and give knowing glances warm as it does Luisito and leave us with the chest full of music and wanting more. A cute and messy pogo a few, the email of some of the songs in 'a moment' who walks around since late 2007 (which turnip! Sleeve not a Grey Day ...), it be one of those bands worthwhile to invite the radio because the return from the stage is impressive. ---
To close the night, Flia Gomez, a stew of people of pending cases, D-hairs, 2papija, a former bassist Nadaquehacer and which do not know history, we deep into a musical style around here is very tanned but well move us jacks (my grandfather told ...). From the care of the lyrics, something to which we are very accustomed Natxo, through the excellent quality of the beats on drums (exercise that Mr. 'X' carries on for no longer than quantity of years), skill cleaning and finesse that gives us the Bear in the four strings, a Chinese to me makes it sawed the head with his solos on the viola and the joy of knowing that Uncle Pol has an unknown scene after getting used to see behind the furious beat of D-hairs ... ie that it is not that hairy beast with all the polenta banging the cans there in the background. I honestly do not expect less from this desclazados murguita of which I had fallen in love just listening to three songs at home. today with ten or eleven songs on stage, in his third touch, and show the court they have and they promise to be (if not resting on their laurels) one of the best new bands of the medium. Turns out the kids handled very well those sweet melodies, one of the best voices in the media, the fury of hard core ... not ... a great band that you can break it out more often ... to see if they get the batteries. Thanks to nachito gave me 'never again' one of those letters that will start in the middle, and all the band if he left the track that gives name to my photoblog to run before you get out and leave me wanting more flia gomez.
no more to report, here are the dates to hear songs from all three bands:
GREY DAY - http://www.purevolume.com/dia_gris
FlíaGÓMEZ - http://www.purevolume.com/fliagomez Http://www.fliagomez.tk
SALSIPUEDES - http://www.myspace.com/salsipuedesuy
and remember!
**********
fire engine, a program semigratuito
Wednesday from 21 to 23 hours. 103.3 FM
BRIDGE
http://www.lateja.org.uy
http://www.fotolog.com/autobombo2007
3061906 098630018
***********
GIFT:
as the poet said:
"see where you
not to stumble over the same stone but otyra
the return time to step forward
and star your land against
.... learned the hard way because they fall
is take one more step
error and was not stumbling, is not confronting error
standing stones. "
(from the first upladeo at http://www .fotolog.com / otra_piedra of 01/07/2008)
http://www.fotolog.com/elhinchauy 
http://www.fotolog.com/elhinchauy 
http://www.fotolog.com/elhinchauy 
After a month of absence local scenarios, GUATUSI is presented live on Friday July 11th at the Pub 'La Barraca' (Daniel Muñoz and Defence).
The band was doomed to recording their second album 'Frog', to be released again by Bizarro Records and will go on sale in September.
After his last show at Sala Zitarrosa, GUATUSI be reunited with the People of the Rock to provide for this new achievement, at this time guests will be Stone Face and Saves Tosca.
The show starts at midnight and tickets can be purchased in advance at $ 90 on All Rock (Paraguay esq. July 18) and in the same pub the night of the show at $ 120.
http://www.airerico.tk
last night watching the show "Just Us", Zalfate, one of its panelists, talked about Zeitgeist, a documentary that in his words, the Internet was breaking in, the truth is so do not know if so, what if I already had heard from him and had seen the doculmental, so I waited to see your comment and while his opinion did not if sent to state that was, among other things, that Christianity is a Myth oft-repeated and copied by thousands of years as any other myth of gods, deities listed there that share features (or would be copies) such that born of a virgin, on December 25, were killed three days, resurrected, were dubbed with the same name, performed miracles, etc., and the list included Jesus Mithra, Horus, Krishna and Dionysus, to which the chicken, host of the program, said, "Denis was not the god of disorder and reel?, That question was not answered very comfortable leaving the question to air the program, thinking is that perhaps the only thing they had in common Dionysus and Jesus was his affinity with wine, but all panelists were open-mouthed and not asked or discussed anything bad that may have made everyone who heard or hear this or sees on television, a shame as some research or basic knowledge of Greek mythology (or if you have a friend Krishna Are) self, at least, creates an interesting question about the veracity of what we are being told, creating a personal opinion or view that the vast majority are outright lies. Below is my opinion and more information after a short introduction.
Zeitgeist is originally a German language expression meaning "the spirit (Geist) of the time (Zeit)." Denotes the intellectual and cultural climate of an era.
It is also the title of a documentary produced by Peter Joseph, webcasting (video that add up to Part 1). The film is structured in three parts:
The Greatest Story Ever Told
The first is an exposition of Christianity as a myth rather than something that actually happened, a hybrid literary-astrology. This is the part that has caused a stir by playing a song as "important" to society and the one that most caught my attention and which profundizaré my comments below.
whole world's a stage
The second part explains the workings of the media propaganda and indoctrination, is perhaps the most important documentary, as it is the most topical subject and which can use the documentary sources true to support his thesis of how they manage means that the citizens themselves agree to be more controlled by their governments.
Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain
The third section discusses the geopolitical and global economy by focusing on the monopoly of the money (along with financial speculation) and military spending. Maybe not as impressive or interesting as the first parts, but quite informative topics are common though, their performance is not of know-general.
Truth or lie, or both. Viewing
Documentary filmmaker from a glance, is pretty bad, especially the first part, departs markedly from any aesthetic and does not account any artistic attitude to rest on what we would call a news report, nothing more, and here is his record error, the potential of the film is not information but his opinion is that it tells us that we should not believe what or we are told that no one owns the truth. But the documentary, on the contrary of this, takes this form or report information, which are listed and taken for "real" information against established, it is as if everyone believed that the earth is square and someone claimed that it is round, because at such revolution that everyone would be against, it would be prudent cash and more or less to prove, and Christopher Columbus did, does he Zeitgest?, No and Yes, or tried, but perhaps he realized that there was like holding his claim and wrinkled or to include false information, but getting the account may include documentary more false than true (or maybe true but not shown to true) and it's up to investigate a bit, just a little, in any encyclopedia or other source, this perhaps is the only value of this documentary, which can generate a discussion or can make people wonder more about life and perhaps touch the issues most important to each individual, which is your spiritual life, social life and financial status, the truth I am a Christian and I love very much "all" the spiritual world, we do not believe that just a piece of meat with movement or that the universe may be a mantle rocks with worms, but I think it is a well trained to religion and blindly ignoring, or a government or a thought, everyone is free to seek the truth in their own way, but to destroy a myth or complain that something is false, we must at least demonstrate, in any form the film is quite sharp while lax to "disprove", and is as light to say that everything really has to do with the upcoming Age of Aquarius How strange it not, good astrology is very interesting and magical also, is given less importance than it should and is provided for charlatans, so, really, we must look, think and conclude. A girl has written a very entertaining and light-hearted I take to include, at the end put the link to your articles to read in or read the original article.
What Lies?
"The first part of astrology is good: the twelve is a magic number, twelve are the constellations of the zodiac. Okay, keeping in mind that astrology is not science even close.
worship the sun as the bringer of light and life certainly existed. Horus is indeed a solar god. The Egyptian priests performed a ritual every morning thanking the light has overcome the darkness. So, for now, yes, the sun was considered a source of life and worship. Not only by the Egyptians, of course.
following is no longer correct: it is true that the ancient religions worshiped natural phenomena and all that did not understand ... But not only worshiped the sun. Also rivers, mountains, lightning, thunder, frost and all that they could chafar afternoon. In Egypt, lived quite well, and their religion was more kind, viewed as more gentle nature, hence their gods were more "good fellow" that panda Greek satraps or gross of the Vikings.
"light against darkness, good versus evil is one of the most widespread mythological dualities known."
Yes, but the duality of "Good vs.. Evil "is fairly recent, I repeat that the first religions, animists, were not as" ethics ", and much fear of natural phenomena. Morality came later.
Now is when they start the "failures."
Horus:
Born December 25: FALSE.
of the Virgin Isis-Meri, Isis resurrected her husband (he had been killed and dismembered by Set, and she had had to find and connect the pieces) with oral sex, his penis was introduced into the body, and Horus was born there. In some versions do not appear fellatio. In others, Isis did not find the penis and makes a papyrus, gold or sycamore wood (depending on the version), and he performs sex to get pregnant. Nowhere does it specify that Isis was a virgin. Finally, it is called Isis, Isis-Meri NO. So FALSE.
accompanied Birth of a Star: NO.
Three Kings: NO. And are four whoppers in ten seconds. Preacher
the twelve: Horus? Horus is the sun god, and if born of a dismembered corpse, and risen recosido based on fellatio, did not need to preach anything. This information is also false.
Horus baptized: "Baptize" literally means "to immerse." We are not aware it was submerged or in a basin to wash it, let alone that it was with religious significance. Or the age of 30, he was immortal. Oh, and this kid was born as a god son of a goddess. He did not need anyone to get into soaking to lead.
Twelve disciples: Twelve gods were the Egyptian pantheon, because it is true that the number twelve is a "magic" or astrologically significant. But Horus had twelve disciples NO.
Miracles Well I'll tell you and tell you if it was a god have any writing. But I do note that in antiquity there were lots of "prophets", "wizards" and "miracle." For anyone who could heal a disease, predict an eclipse or sulfur ignite relatively ostentatious, he was a magician. Anything that people do not understand, it was magic or a miracle. And 99% of the population at that time did not know or understand anything. Beware of this: for those parts, was "magician" who knew almost write your name in the sand. In the Middle Ages witch that know how to use medicinal herbs, contraception or abortion. In the Middle Ages, reading without moving mouth was magic. Seriously, read this without moving the lips or without declaiming aloud, was magic. You're doing something right now that ten centuries ago was a miracle. Keep this in mind when judging the "miracles" that were made before that, a bottle of betadine would have been miraculous.
pastor Rod: Do you remember I told you before that religions were based on the reality of peoples? Well, if there are so many pastor among the prophets, not because they copied each other, but because by then all were shepherds or farmers. For example, Ulysses, king of Ithaca, was also a pastor in a rocky island. So I do not mean much to bring Horus a shepherd's staff. Sure, there were engineers at the time, would not bring a laptop.
Crucified's when I realized that the film directly lying. BALLS A Horus was crucified. Dead
three days, not three days or eight quarters: it was not dead, period. With so obviously he did not rise. That was his daddy ... Osiris.
Anointed: Anoint means "anointing with oil." Oils at that time were expensive and fragrant. The "anoint" a person seems to be that ended up having a sacred significance. The dead were anointed and, at most, a few statues of gods. As with the case grazing, associate the sacred oil is relatively common. Today you can buy a jug of oil and a kilo of incense, but at that time, those things were luxuries reserved for the very rich, very very gods or kings. C'mon, it's a status symbol, more than anything else.
that time we will see a long list of lies and a couple of misrepresentations, obviously put there to convince us that all the details of the life of Jesus of Nazareth are copied from that of Horus. Make no mistake: there are details of the life of Jesus that are copied. But it was not copied from Horus.
Brief History of Horus, the god Osiris was married with Isis. Set, the god of evil, killed and dismembered Osiris. Isis searched the pieces, sewed and resurrected Osiris with his extensive knowledge of magic. Of Osiris and Isis raised Horus was born, who immediately said "Walk is September, we'll have a talk?" He went to look for in September, urged on by slaps him, and was elected chief god of their pantheon. This beautiful story exemplified the suffering at the hands of evil, life continued in subsequent generations through female fertility, and the final defeat of evil. (NOTE: a pantheon of gods is a collection of mythology: Zeus is the leader of the Greek pantheon, Odin the pantheon Viking, etc). To learn more or find out if I'm lying, seek information on your own, which is what I want to show with this post.
Luckily I already knew details of Egyptian mythology, Buddhist and Mithraic, and I began to suspect a manipulative intention from the beginning. But who knows nothing of these issues is able to believe everything she says "documentary." And that is a mistake. This is the misfortune of education today. It teaches people to doubt that with such authority, so as not to believe the official version, you know and you think critically. But not taught to collate data and compare the information. And believe Conspiranoids version blindly and without question is the same as believing the official story without question, is not having a critical and swallow what you loose. Doubt is more than good, but it is worse than wrong to accept anything without contrasting.
EDIT: Not for people entering comments saying that Isis was a virgin, so I have to add an explanatory paragraph. Look, the conception of Horus had to be magical and miraculous, because obviously a dead not you get pregnant just like that. But Isis was not a virgin. First, she was married to Osiris. A married woman is a virgin if not specified, it is assumed that having sex with husband. Second: Osiris showed no sexual continence, was sleeping with Nephthys (wife of Seth). Isis Nephthys disguised himself in order to have sex with Osiris. Indicating that Osiris Isis had sex with, because if Isis had been a virgin, why would a disguise Nephthys Isis, Osiris if he wanted to seduce? Third, does not specify that Isis was a virgin, and virginity is low (hence value). Specified virginity in young and single it was supposed to be very valuable in the married So, if not specified anywhere, is that there is not. And if you want more evidence, know that this detail appears in many ancient texts. For example, in Homer's Iliad, Agamemnon clarifies his slave Criseyde that "I prefer to Clytemnestra, who was betrothed virgin." Come on, even Clytemnestra, wife of the king, clarifies that she was a virgin before marriage, because virginity was so scarce and valuable that was published from the rooftops. If not specified, there is not, and less of a married woman.
One thing is clear: I am not denying that Christians copied many details, dogmas and miracles of other religions. That's syncretism and as I said before, is common and there's no denying ... Moreover, we must teach people what it is and what details were on earlier myths and how they are culturally merging both. There are versions of virgin birth before the supposed birth of Jesus. This indicates that Christians can copy the dogma of the virgin birth. But not copied from Isis. But let
. If, Horus, which is well known mythology, we have tried to sneak in a trolled, to see what follows:
Attis of Phrygia:
Born of a virgin: The phallus Agdistis cut a tree fell and Nana became pregnant after putting the tree on his chest, which disappeared leaving her pregnant. If it is "technically" there was no sex in their design. But the "immaculate conception" of Mary as a dogma was the news that there was no sexual detail included in the set, absolutely nothing. This reflects the phallus is not exactly the same idea of \u200b\u200bpurity, but hey, we accept that if born of a virgin.
December 25: No.
Crucified: No.
dead three days: No mention of time, it was dead.
Risen reborn as PINE. Gives me is not the same.
Want to know more about Attis of Phrygia?
http://www.theoi.com/Phrygios/Attis.html
Krishna:
Born of the virgin Devaki, Devaki was a princess, and was not virgin. Krishna was born of his mother and father Devaki Vasudeva, to traditional. According to one tradition, Krishna was an avatar of Vishnu. But avatar or not, nowhere places that his conception was Marian. Recall that in Hinduism souls moving around and are reincarnated.
Star in the East: No.
miracle: He fought demons and won, among other things. There are many miracles in their tradition. But again, that by that time there were miracles of supply.
risen: No. He died. According to Hindu tradition, your soul is getting better in each reincarnation depending on how you behave, so Krishna became a god. But that is not revived.
Want to know more about Krishna? Well, he has read for a while, hear! Take a look:
http://www.hindujagruti.org/hinduism/kno
wledge / category / lord-Krushna
http://veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/historical-krsna.htm
http : / / www.arshabodha.org / ab / WCMS / en / home / Teachings / Bhagavadgita / index.html
http://www.atmajyoti.org/hi_gita_commentary_1.asp
Dionysius of Greece:
Born of a virgin: Depends on myth. In one seduces Zeus and Semele deflowers obviously. In another, leaves her pregnant Zeus giving drinking a beverage, and in this version it is born of a virgin.
Born December 25: No.
Itinerant Preacher: What he did was taught to cultivate the vine and make wine. More than a preacher seems a professor of agriculture (which is almost more useful). Deified it must have come from how much he liked the rock XD
wine miracle: As I had divine powers, one would, between them reached the realm of the dead without invitation, to make people happy and drive her crazy. Quite related to the wearing of the wine to those who do not know, of course.
Water into wine: Well, come in their tradition, yes.
King of Kings: This is the superlative Hebrew, is a literary figure (as a metaphor), dating from the Old Testament: "God from God, Light from Light" ... In short, a way of saying things. Only I have not seen it applied to Dionisio anywhere.
only Son of God: The only son of Zeus, Dionysus? For favorrrr. Sons of Zeus: Hercules, Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Persephone, Perseus, Helen, Minos, nine muses, Hephaestus, Ares, Hebe ... And some more depending on which versions of stories. Anyway. Alpha and Omega
means the beginning and end, as the alpha and omega are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet. I do not know if Dionisio he was given the title, but if they deified to bring to humanity the Rioja, like if you said that XD affection.
risen: He became immortal through fame, which is not the same. Come on, that like Hercules and other mortals, it is therefore agreed that became a god. It is true that a couple of times down to Hades and returned happily, but remember that he might go down to Hades still alive, as did Orpheus. Neither died and rose again, was headed to Olympus, by a large number of followers.
People here are a few similarities between details of the immaculate conception and the transformation of water into wine. These ideas it could happen to Christianity by syncretism. What of the immaculate conception is not so sure, since one of the versions include sex. But in the matter of turning water into wine, the resemblance is sooo suspicious. And the miracle of water into wine only in the Gospel of St. John, who is the most different from the other three. And Denis was before Jesus, so there I have to give the reason the authors of the documentary. "I had a hard time using only the correct data?
True, there are tenets of Christianity that existed before the birth of Jesus. The idea of \u200b\u200bthe virginal conception existed previously. And it's good to teach that to people: it would Interestingly enough, those who call themselves Christians were set more to respect the ideals of love for others and less on miracles and virginity. I'm all for criticizing the dogmas ... but I am against that matches up with where there are none.
Want to know more about Dionysus? Do not miss the Greek mythology! Falcon Crest with superpowers! Adultery! Treason! Adventure! More here:
http://www.theoi.com/Olympios/Dionysos.html
http://www.pantheon.org/areas/all/articles.html
Mitra of Persia ... and Greece, and Rome at times:
Here I have to make a bullet: Mitra does have a lot of coincidences point to Jesus of Nazareth, and possibly were the Christians who were copied, as the cult of Mithra was older. I can not be sure because I was not there and Mitra who ran against Jesus by believers themselves know very little.
Moreover, Mitra has a big problem: the first is a figure of Zoroastrianism, and then goes to Europe with changes. The European cult of Mithras (Mithraism or mysteries of Mithras) was the most competitive Salvatori religion made Christianity on its head. And some people think that all he did finally beat that Christianity was ... Mithraism passed olímpicamente de las mujeres. Es lo que ocurre cuando decides obviar a la mitad de la humanidad. Pero bueno, rebusquemos en la historia de Mitra/Mitras, a ver si aclaramos algo:
Nacido de una virgen: No en todas las versiones. En la hindú, Mitra era hijo de la diosa madre Aditi, que NO era virgen. En la zoroastrista, Mitra era una creación directa del dios Ahura Mazda. En otras, es hijo de Ahura Mazda y Anahita. Más tarde se le llamó hijo de una diosa-madre, Anahita. Y en un templo seleúcida perdido al este de Irán (uno solo) hay una dedicatoria a “Anahita, inmaculada virgen madre del dios Mithras”, pero recordemos que el Mitra de Los Misterios de Mitra romanos NO es el mismo que el Mithras persa, or anything like equal to Mithras Hindu, but all three come from the same site, in three different cultures is their religion (and their mythology). In short, there are several versions about, NOT a consistent. The authors of the documentary have been seized as a straw to a registration, (ONE) which is not corroborated by other information we have on the three branches of the cult of Mithra. That might be true, but does not stand what historians call a witness multiple criteria (multiple attestation in English). If multiple versions of a myth, we must tell them all not to take for granted as absolute truth and a detail of a recording alone. However, unlike the authors, I say that yes, there is an inscription in a temple Iranian says yes, that Mithras was the son of a virgin goddess. I will add that since the authors of the documentary might give the three versions, because that is what you would expect from a documentary purpose.
December 25: Yes, the Christians here were copied. The Roman Mithras, NOT the Persian Mithras.
12 disciples: Mitra? Where did they get that?
miracle: Well it was a creation of a god ... In the original myth, Ahura Mazda as God did, so one would have, but do not know. The Romans worshiped Mithras was eminently warrior did not know whether miracles. Do not argue, and I repeat that at that time, miracles abounded more than now.
died three days In any tradition I've ever seen.
Risen: Why, if I was born a god? Nor has.
Known as "light", "truth" I am not aware, but perhaps those adjectives come from the worship of Ahura Mazda, the god of Zoroastrianism, he was a god of light and good (and very nice, the Truth be told).
Day worship: Sunday or day of the Sun ": I do not know that was once a week, much less on Sunday. Buuut ... often the case that the cult of Mithras confused with that of Sol Invictus, Sol Invictus and yes he loved Sunday. By syncretism, were about to merge the two figures (Mithras and Sol Invictus), although the cult of Mithra continued to occur separately. But some of the attributes of both gods were mixed and merged. Hence the confusion. And in this case is understandable confusion, I repeat that the cult of Roman Mithras YES has many similarities with Christian worship.
Christianity make this clear: the Jews worshiped the sabbath. Christians, to differentiate, on Sunday. And the Muslims, for diferenciarese of the two, on Friday. It's as simple as wanting to be different in that subject to the foregoing.
Mitra is true that Roman has many similarities in their worship with Christ Jew. The problem is that in the film are forced comparisons (as of the virgin is forced, because they have chosen the version that they liked) or he invent them (as of 12 disciples and resurrection and death for three days there I know where they have taken). Why? Because there are real similarities between Christianity / Roman Catholicism and Mithraism were not served to defend the astrological theories discussed below.
Want to know more about Mitra? Fixer is, we know almost nothing! But you can try Here:
http://www.pantheon.org/areas/all/articles.html
"The fact is that there are numerous saviors, from different periods, from around the world who agree with these general characteristics."
as hot dogs and you take the list, hoping that the amount of information than long overwhelmed the staff and believe the lies and misrepresentations that have been released before are applicable to all other names that are passed quickly.
Forgive me if I say "lies" about all the mistakes I've pointed out, instead of "mistakes." If there were one or two, could be errors. If you speak only that Mithra was born December 25, or that Horus had twelve disciples (twelve gods in their pantheon), you might think are mistakes. But this whole list of false information can not be the result of errors. This has been the intention to deceive people. Because if not, tell me what to do in this list that runs so fast so they would not read it, "Thor, Odin's son of the Gauls" How the Gauls, Thor and Odin?! And Sibyls and Adonis, which have in common with each other and with Jesus Christ that the bacon to speed.
have long a string of beads on these earlier "gods" have released a list of other few, and have hoped that nobody collate information.
Moral: check the information that you provide. Do not believe anything. Let
still remains:
Jesus of Nazareth, also known as the Christ, which means "anointed one", meaning that at some point they put oil in his head (but in a sacred and with great respect, eh?). The answers I give here will not say they are true, but those which conform to Christian mythology, as I have said before that respective mythologies:
Born of the Virgin Mary: So says the tradition, yes. It was a myth relatively groundbreaking at the time. Despite what I want to believe this documentary, the myth of the immaculate conception was quite groundbreaking at the time. As Egyptian mythology claimed the position of women through capacity Isis to give life through his sexuality and fertility, Christian mythology was asserting a woman for her chastity. Then it degenerated not see, but the original myth was quite tender.
December 25 is not known. Possibly his followers wanted to give more "cache" and put the nativity on that date ... or to crush their meaning Mithraic.
Star in the East: It says the tradition.
Three Kings: The Bible does not put how many, and NO. Were wise astrologers. Those who saw them thought they were kings, because they were rich, it seemed. = Persian Magi (East) = worshipers of supreme god Ahura Mazda of the Persians, whose symbol is the fire = astrologers. Hence the "wise men". What I was three gifts they brought were (thanks to Yatoshi and Joseph for the clarification). I did not know this because I have not read the Bible (though I'm on it.) But I want to know why someone made a video, called "documentary" and not read the sources. This ruling is big, guys. These people are looking for evidence to show that Jesus is a copy, and has not looked at the Gospels. Come on, it will Justito professionalism.
Preacher at 12: Yes, so says tradition.
Baptized at 30, yes, by John the Baptist, which certainly did exist and was highly respected in his time. John the Baptist is a prophet in three religions: Christianity, Islam and Manichaeism. But come on, that "baptize" was to give people a ahogadilla in a river, that it means "to immerse."
Twelve disciples, also says that tradition.
miracle: Actually not. For what was fashionable in Israel at that time, Jesus Miracles rather little. The Romans were pretty cop of the Jews, they said that Israel had prophets everywhere, and everyone did a milagrillo another (and this is historical.) Simon "The Wizard" that guy who according to the New Testament Jesus sought to buy the ability to grant the Holy Spirit (the origin of the word "simony" = faith purchase money), was more famous among the Romans that Jesus Christ, fact killed himself before the emperor Nero when he tried to prove he could fly (it pulled the top of a column and "escornó").
King of kings, the son of God, Light of the world, Lamb of God, Alpha and Omega, King of Kings: superlative Hebrew, appears in the Old Testament, and is a literary as a metaphor, where we said Dionisio. The alpha and omega is a praise in Greek, meaning "the beginning and the end." Applied to God (through Yato for the tip), not surprisingly, since God supposedly existed for ever and ever; light of the world have already said that is a compliment to represent the fight against darkness, and Lamb of God means Jesus was the sacrifice made by God (the Jews sacrificed lambs, and as Yahweh allegedly sacrificed his son as so was the "lamb of God", by Yatoshi and Joseph for this information).
Crucified: Yep, by Roman law to request of the Jewish authorities because he was a loudmouth Jew. Jewish tradition says he died "hung", not crucified, but that is not safe for sure, because that's what it says a Talmudic version, and really, by that time there were many Jesus in Palestine.
resurrected on the third day, the tradition does say this. Then also said that ascended to heaven. ![[info]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vGM22SSWfQIL-pTtDmVhFtk7YspG9BJH3zDm5CSZrO0XbJcXDM9_mKmfaA2qIvir8RrBdlSwJLjvarlBPLXTUB4Ro4tps_whPZQ_oGWU52flo=s0-d){kind=small}
http://natsufan.livejournal.com/24342.html
